Sunday, November 28, 2004

Pinkas takes aim: "Where the hell has American Jewry been?"

Seems to us like Alon Pinkas is not expecting to take the helm of the AJCongress. First, in his parting shot several months ago, he called the venerable Conference of Presidents of Major (and minor) Jewish Organizations' regular meetings with Israeli politicians a waste of good smoked salmon and bagels. Now he says that American Jewish Organizations are totally unable to focus on solving the real problems plaguing the Jewish community. Makes us wonder why he might want to be one of those big machers in charge.

Pinkas unplugged in the JPOST

Seems clear who lost the vote

Aside from John Kerry that is. From Haaretz:

The Jews lost

Both sides claim victory. The Republicans note that the level of Jewish support rose from 19 percent in 2000 to 25 percent in 2004 (some peg this support at 24 percent), showing a significant political shift in the Jewish community. This increase is negligible, say the Democrats, noting that Republican hopes of winning 40 percent of the Jewish vote were groundless from the beginning.

But one fact is clear: The Jews of the United States who voted en masse for John Kerry, assigning top priority to issues of social justice, the separation of church and state, and protecting civil rights, woke up on November 3 and discovered that they had lost on all levels.


AND NOW THE DEBATE BEGINS:

We come out of this campaign very nervous," says Hannah Rosenthal, executive director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA), one of the Jewish communities' strongest organizations. Rosenthal, a Democrat who served in Bill Clinton's administration, anticipates a gloomy future for the Jewish community during the coming four years, especially when it comes to social issues.

She becomes enraged when people talk about the "moral values" that decided the recent elections, and heatedly explains that the moral values of Judaism, as she knows them, call on people to help the weak and needy. "Turning the gay marriage issue into the definition of morality and values is narrow and divisive," Rosenthal says. "We need to look at the real values and say out loud that the budget cuts that Bush is planning for the poor and the needy are impossible," she adds.

This attitude has broad support among the Jewish activists at the big convention center in Cleveland, but it is certainly not the only approach. A considerable number of Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox Jews voted for Bush and agree with the president on the question of "values." They are not worried by the fact that "morality" grabbed a central place on the election stage.

One such Bush supporter is Nathan Diament, the head of the Orthodox Union's Institute for Public Affairs, who appears to be very satisfied with the election results.

"We should be comfortable with the fact that religious values are taking center stage in the public arena," he says. "This is not a danger for the Jewish community." He dismisses the concerns of Jewish Democrats about mixing religion and values with politics, saying these fears are groundless.

"It is true that Jewish history was marked by religious persecution, but America is a different place," says Diament.

Rosenthal could not agree less with this statement. "It would be foolish if the Jewish community were to forget that its success and its security were achieved largely thanks to the strong separation of church and state. It is never good news for the Jews when a country tries to define itself as a Christian state instead of putting the emphasis on religious freedom and freedom from religion," she says.

Re-alignment?

More on the permanent GOP majority. This is WaPo's take

Rove contemplating a permanent GOP majority

Or is it a Rove majority? Who will win the Rove primary in the next two years or less? Does that mean that the GOP primary for 2008 will be over before it begins? see Newsweek

Business Week hits the mark

with a cogent analysis why Arafat's overdue demise is unlikely to change the status quo. Stan Crock reports...

Friday, November 26, 2004

Orthodox Union looks to the next 4 years

This article in Haaretz has many troubling aspects.

  1. Does the OU have thousands of synagogues? Their web site hardly lists one thousand. Does the fact that they represent food products factor into this? We did not know that packaged goods vote. Maybe food gets to vote in the inner cities of Blue States.
  2. Was the OU was displeased with their current level of access over the past four years?
  3. Aside from a small sample poll from Frank Luntz that did not break out OU voters where are the numbers? All the big stories about Orthodox Jews going big time for Bush are in the Haredi community that the OU hardly represents. The OU is not as organized a political force as they might think. They should be careful about overplaying their hand.
And now the Question is whether the OU will use its new influence on the disengagement plan as seem here in another Haaretz mention.


Thursday, November 25, 2004

A Frum Jew goes to Washington...

...and he finds a warm reception.

The realization of a vision

by Jonathan Rosenblum
Mishpacha
November 24, 2004

No American election in living memory elicited the same passions as the 2004 American presidential election, with partisans on both sides convinced that a victory for their opponents would signal the end of the world. The closeness of the 2000 election only intensified the battle over every vote.

The Orthodox community was no exception to the heightened excitement surrounding the elections. For the first time ever, the Lakewood Vaad endorsed a particular candidate -- President George W. Bush – "in consideration for his outstanding positions on family issues, domestic security and of significant consequences for Acheinu B’nai Yisroel in Eretz Yisroel." Every Orthodox rabbi in Cleveland, led by Rabbi Chaim Stein, Rosh Yeshivas Telshe, signed a Kol Koreh calling on every Orthodox Jew to vote, and on the Shabbos preceding the election, every congregational rabbi in Cleveland stressed in his drasha the importance of voting.

Rabbi Yehiel Kalish, Midwest regional director of Agudath Israel of America, logged thousands of miles in the last week of the campaign, in the key state of Ohio, traveling between Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati on voter registration and getting out the vote activities. And his colleague, Rabbi Moshe Matz, the Southern Florida regional director of Agudath Israel, was busy doing the same in southern Florida, another crucial state. Agudath Israel of America got involved in voter registration efforts to an unprecedented degree out of a feeling that it would be a chilul Hashem for Orthodox Jews to sit on the sidelines in an election perceived as so vital by the American public, and especially after the 2000 elections demonstrated that every vote does count.

The frenzy of activity peaked on election day. In the Telshe Yeshiva community in Cleveland, Bais Yaakov students set up an ad hoc babysitting center in two stores so that mothers could drop off their younger children while they voted. A network of volunteer drivers was set up to take voters to polling places. In Lakewood and Florida forces were similarly mobilized to get out the vote on election day.


WHEN THE VOTES WERE TALLIED, it became clear that Orthodox Jews had turned out in large numbers, and that they had voted overwhelmingly for President Bush. That support for the President grew stronger as one moved rightward on the religious spectrum towards the close-knit Chassidic communities. Despite the theological anti-Zionism in the latter, the concern for the well-being of Jews in Eretz Yisrael remains overwhelming. Thus in Kiryas Yoel, a Satmar community in Sullivan County, New York, President Bush won 88% of the vote – 6314 to 529 (with the votes for Senator Kerry attributed to internal communal divisions.)

Al Gore Jr. carried Rockland County by 21,000 votes in 2000; this year George Bush carried it by 1,301 votes. That swing was largely attributed to the heavy Orthodox vote for the President. In New Square, for instance, President Bush won 99% of the vote; in 2000 he captured only 21 votes in New Square. When asked to explain the shift, the Skverer Rebbe answered, "hakaros hatov." In those election districts in Rockland County in which Orthodox Jews comprise more than 50% of the eligible voters, the President captured 84% of the votes.

In Lakewood, New Jersey the communal efforts of fifty campaign workers (without direct support from the national or state Republican parties) paid off heavily for Bush. Though New Jersey went for the Democratic candidate, President Bush carried Lakewood by better than two to one. In the 12 election districts with a majority of Orthodox voters, he won 85% of the vote, and in the one exclusively Orthodox district, he won over 99%. One wag joked that it was doubtful if the President did better in his own family.

Similar patterns were repeated in other heavily Orthodox areas. The Bush vote increased by 80% in Boro Park and over 100% in Flatbush. Both had gone heavily for Gore in 2000, and this year swung into the Bush column.


THE FRENETIC POLITICAL ACTIVITY up to and including election day was the culmination of a three-year-old vision of one man: Jeff (Yehoshua) Ballabon, an Orthodox Jew from West Hempstead New York. The Forward recently named Ballabon one of the fifty most influential Jews in America. The Forward’s citation credited him with having "basically created a new demographic this election cycle [w]ith a groundbreaking outreach event during the Republican National Convention [that] helped put his fellow Orthodox Jews on the map as a separate Republican constituency" and described him as a "charismatic advocate of politics as an outgrowth of Torah . . ."

Ballabon, 41, has long been active in Republican politics. After graduating Yale Law School, he worked on the staff of Senator John Danforth, now U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. For more than a decade he has been guiding corporate clients through the labyrinth of government in Washington D.C. and various state capitals.

A little more than three years ago, he began to look for a way to connect his political activity more directly to his life as a Torah Jew. He found himself increasingly discontent with all the extant models of Jewish political activity, which are based on a view of Jews as an ethnic community with certain interests they strive to protect through political activity. Ballabon’s first insight was that Jews should function in every way, including the political sphere, as a faith community, and that the values they should be promoting are those of the Torah.

Ballabon, who had met then-Governor Bush in Austin in 1999 and had the chance to spend a few minutes talking with him, felt confident that his personal commitment to faith and values was profound, as was his feeling of respect, even affinity, towards the Jewish people and faith. Ballabon worked on the Bush campaign in 2000. Soon after he was elected, despite winning only 19% of the Jewish vote, President Bush began to prove his friendship.

Two events in close proximity triggered Ballabon’s search for a new type of Jewish political activity. The first was the U.N. sponsored Durban Conference on Racism in late August and early September of 2001, and the second was 9/11, just a week after the conclusion of Durban. Ballabon was particularly moved by the fact that President Bush, alone among major world leaders, refused to send an American delegation to the U.N. Conference on Racism at Durban, which quickly degenerated into an anti-Israel hate fest. In that refusal, President Bush signaled that he attributed no moral legitimacy to resolutions passed by the U.N. General Assembly, which has long since become a debating society for the passage of anti-Israel resolutions. And 9/11 brought home that there are fundamental value cleavages in the world, a point President Bush emphasized when he described as an Axis of Evil the major state sponsors of terrorism – Iran, Iraq, and North Korea.

Ballabon’s second insight was practical, not philosophical. Only someone firmly planted in both the Torah world and that of values-based politics could be the bridge for Torah Jews to the larger political world. Otherwise the conversation across the table would always be ones between strangers, each seeking to advance particular interests, not a conversation of allies searching for common ground. As a graduate of Yeshiva Ner Israel, and someone who has always been very open about his religious observance in both his political and professional life, Ballabon was suited to that task.

He grew up in a home in which Kiddush Hashem was a constant theme. His maternal grandfather, Dr. Menachem Distenfeld, was raised as a Chortkower Chassid in Lemberg, Poland. As a young man, he traveled to ask the Rebbe where he should study for semichah, Warsaw or Vienna. To his amazement, the Chortkower Rebbe told him to go to Vienna and become a doctor and that it would "save your life as well as that of many others." And so it was. He and his wife were removed by the Nazis, ya"sh, from a group bound for the death camps so that he could treat Poles suffering from typhus. And after they escaped into the forests, they were spared by the no less virulently anti-Semitic Ukrainian partisans, who had need of a doctor.

In 1945, in Czernowitz, Dr. Distenfeld and his family arrived as refugees on a cold erev Shabbos, knowing nobody. Crowds of Jews hustled past immersed in their own lives, but one man – the Skulener Rebbe – who was walking by, immediately turned and came over to the small group standing lost on the street. On the spot, he took Dr. Distenfeld and his family into his own apartment, and a lifelong bond was formed. The Skulener Rebbe was the father to hundreds of ravaged war-orphans, and Dr. Distenfeld was their doctor. In the United States, after the war, when the Skulener Rebbe had to travel for his health, Dr. Distenfeld always traveled with him, often spending weeks as his companion.

Although Dr. Distenfeld passed away when he was still very young, growing up, Yehoshua heard constant stories of all the chesed that his grandfather did for people, such as paying for the medicine of those who could not afford it and pretending that their pills were manufacturers’ samples.

Just as his grandfather had used medicine as his vehicle for Kiddush Hashem, so Ballabon decided he would use political access. As a kippah-wearing Jew in the public limelight, he found himself constantly presented with opportunities to correct distortions of Judaism by so many who claim to speak in its name. Evangelical Christians and traditional Catholics in particular were always thrilled to meet a Jew who could reassure them that there are still Jews today living according to the precepts of the Torah.


ONCE HIS VISION of Torah-based political activism had taken form, Ballabon confronted two tasks. The first was to convince the political players within the national Republican Party that there are hundreds of thousands of Jews like him, who share many common goals with faith-based constituencies within the Republican Party. Reaching out to the Orthodox community, Ballabon argued repeatedly, is not just a matter of having a kosher table at a Republican Jewish event. Orthodox Jews, he explained, view life and politics from a completely different perspective than their secular Jewish counterparts.

The second task was to convince his fellow Orthodox Jews that politics need not be a realm that one enters only at the cost of one’s soul. While government cannot help us raise moral children, he pointed out, it can prevent certain forms of moral pollution that make the task of Orthodox parents much more difficult. Only government, for instance, can redefine marriage in such a way as to undermine all Torah morality.

WHILE MANY WERE ENTHUSIASTIC about Ballabon’s ideas, two in particular have become his partners. The first, Gedalia Litke, a New York attorney and like Ballabon a Ner Yisroel product, already had made a name for himself in Orthodox circles by founding Kayama, an organization that encourages divorcing non-Orthodox couples to obtain gittin. When Ballabon, back from Washington, wanted to bring his vision to the community and its leaders, it was Litke who made the introductions and helped him establish his bona fides.

The second, a few years younger than Ballabon, was Michael Fragin, today New York Governor George Pataki’s liason to the Jewish community. Already emerging as a young askan, Fragin was looking for a more defined and active place from which he could make a significant and positive impact on Jewish political life. Fragin quickly was persuaded by the "Kiddush Hashem" vision of politics and immediately put his enormous energy and encyclopedic knowledge of the Jewish community to work.

Together with friends like Litke and Fragin, Ballabon formed ROSHEM, the Center for Jewish Values, in order to introduce Torah Jews to politicians, and to sell the possibilities of political action to observant Jews. Through ROSHEM, Ballabon introduced politicians with a strong social conservative message – e.g., Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania – to successful Orthodox professionals and business people who could support their political campaigns.

At the same time, Ballabon was a whirlwind of activity promoting his vision of Torah-based political activism across the spectrum of Orthodoxy. He participated in roundtable discussons at conventions of Agudath Israel of America, in which he discussed ways to approach social issues within the guidelines of Da’as Torah in order to maximize the Kiddush Hashem message, while at the same time, not diminishing the uniqueness of Torah. He also addressed the national convention of the Orthodox Union and the rabbinical training conference of the National Council of Young Israel. And he began promoting his political vision to leading Orthodox writers. Always the message was the same: Politics is not just the art of the deal. It can be about values as well.

By constantly stressing moral values, Ballabon was able to make the Orthodox community into a more significant political player than its numbers would warrant. There are fewer than half a million Orthodox voters – hardly a large group in a national election (though not insignificant if the election turns on a few hundred votes). But as a new demographic group focused around issues of values, Orthodox Jews were highly sought after by important constituencies within the Republican Party. Ballabon’s personal experience in Washington confirms that principled action is often the most practically effective. His influence has grown as he has been perceived as a person of conviction and integrity than someone who merely buys and sells access.

Though he did not then know it, he was following in the path of the greatest of American Orthodox askanim, Rabbi Moshe Sherer, the long-time president of Agudath Israel of America. In discussions with politicians, Rabbi Sherer always confined himself to the principles of the issue on the table at that moment. He never engaged in horse-trading. That insistence on principles generated much of the respect in which politicians held him.


THE SELLING OF BALLABON’S VISION CULMINATED at this year’s Republican National Convention when the Republicans became the first party ever to host an event specifically aimed at Orthodox Jews. (See Mishpacha, "The Republicans Woo Orthodox Jews"). That event, which he and his allies coordinated, signaled that the Republican Party had finally absorbed the message that Orthodox Jews are different. For years he had been hammering home the point that many Orthodox Jews are supportive of the President’s broader domestic agenda, not just his foreign relations agenda, and therefore the pitch to the Orthodox community has to be broader than the traditional one to Jews stressing the Republican Party’s commitment to a strong and secure Israel. All the speakers at the Waldorf-Astoria event were prepped in advance to talk about religious values and to convey that the support of Orthodox Jews is important to the party because of shared values.

At the same time, Ballabon emphasized to Republican politicians that Orthodox Jews are, in fact, the most intensely concerned with Israel’s security of any Jewish group, and far more sophisticated about Israel’s security needs than the average Jewish voter. They would not be satisfied with slogans about a "strong and secure" Israel, but would want to hear how Israel fits into the speaker’s overall world view on such topics as the war on terror and relations with Europe and multinational organizations. The audience at the Waldorf-Astoria, Ballabon explained, would be listening closely to how the speaker placed Israel in a broader context of values, both religious and democratic.

As Ballabon had foreseen, only Orthodox Jews themselves could do the groundwork for such an event and ensure that the broadest possible spectrum of the leadership of Orthodox Jewry be represented. The textbook strategy for such campaign events is to make sure that all geographic regions are represented. But in the Orthodox world, geography counts far less than such factors as what Chassidic group one belongs to or at which yeshiva one learned. And those matters are not included in the briefing book of even the best prepared campaign.

Ballabon, Michael Fragin and two young men with yeshiva backgrounds -- Zev Safran and Michael Bleicher -- devoted many long nights to compiling a list of all the major Orthodox groups and working the phones to make sure that they would be represented. Geography, and the concerns of the campaign were not ignored entirely: They made sure that rabbis from or with strong connections to Florida, Ohio and other "battleground" states were present.

Nor was the Republican outreach to the Orthodox community confined to the Waldorf-Astoria event. Senators Rich Santorum of Pennsylvania and Norm Coleman of Minnesota visited OHEL, the largest Orthodox social service agency in Boro Park, and from there walked around the corner to the Novominsk Yeshiva to meet with three members of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah of Agudath Israel of America – the Novominsker Rebbe, Rabbi Aharon Schechter, and the Mattersdorfer Rav. They witnessed the work of Hatzoloh and learned how Torah Jews ran into the conflagration at the Twin Towers to save lives. That evening Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis gave an emotional invocation at the Republican convention, in which she connected her experiences as a child of the Holocaust to her support for President Bush.


THE WALDORF-ASTORIA EVENT demonstrated that Ballabon had sold the Republican Party on at least testing his vision. But his theories still had to be proven on the ground. In the last weeks of the campaign, Ballabon and Fragin put their jobs on hold in order to spend 20-hour days with a Jewish outreach team in Florida on get-out-the-vote efforts, and coordinating by phone similar efforts in Ohio, and New Jersey, which polls showed suddenly to be "in-play."

At the same time, they did not ignore New York, the state with by far the highest concentration of Orthodox Jews. Even though there was no doubt that New York’s electoral votes would go to Senator John Kerry, the Orthodox vote in New York was still critical from Ballabon’s point of view. First, because he knew that it was important to the President not only to win the electoral vote, but also the popular vote, and remove any lingering questions of the legitimacy of his presidency left over from the 2000 election, in which Democrat Al Gore Jr. won the popular vote.

In addition, the many election districts in New York in which there are heavy concentrations of Orthodox voters provided the test cases to Ballabon’s theories, and he knew that the Washington political gurus would be looking closely at those districts. The election would be won or lost in Ohio and Florida, but the battle for Kiddush Hashem was just as important in New York.

During the hectic final weeks of the campaign, when there was little time for reflection of any kind, there were still moments that reinforced Ballabon’s vision three years earlier that politics too could be a vehicle for Kiddush Hashem. One was when a Jewish contemporary working as a senior policy advisor in the Administration told him that he had come down to work in Florida because, brought up in a secular home, he had long wanted to find his Jewish identity, and he knew that he could best do so by being exposed to the Orthodox community.


For Jeff Ballabon, the satisfaction and relief he felt as he went to sleep early in the morning on election eve was not yet complete. That would only come over the next two days, as precinct level results poured in from around the country and showed that Orthodox Jews had voted in unprecedented numbers and overwhelmingly for President Bush.

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

The Jews learn "Faith Speak"

Seems kind of sad that the people of the book need to be reminded about God and faith by others.

Rosenblatt's Red Blue Analysis

Depite his obsession with the goings on at the World Jewish Congress Gary has something to add to the conversation.

Mehlman says: Let's hear it for the grassroots

I imagine there might be some room for the frum community in this strategy.

Families Favor the GOP

So says the LA Times

hmmm... I wonder where the Jews fit in here. Are we so out of step with America that even our migration from city to suburb to exurb is different?

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

Scalia tells it like it is

The bottom line is that the words "separation of Chuch and State" are not found in the constitution.

After Scalia's wonderful prepared remarks I sat through 30 minutes of Jews asking Scalia the exact same question in different form. Someone had the ignorance to challenge the esteemed justice by saying the separation of chuch and state is found in the constitution. There were some similar gems. People need to come to shul better prepared.

Uri Heilman, the J Post NY Chief (his father does not own the paper), has some good thoughts as well though his take on the title is totally off:

Speaking at a conference on religious freedom in America on Monday hosted by Manhattan's Congregation Shearith Israel, the oldest Jewish congregation in North America, Scalia said that the founding fathers never advocated the separation of church and state and that America has prospered because of its religiousness.

"There is something wrong with the principle of neutrality," said Scalia, considered among the court's staunchest conservatives. Neutrality as envisioned by the founding fathers, Scalia said, "is not neutrality between religiousness and nonreligiousness; it is between denominations of religion."

Scalia cited early examples of support of religion in the public sphere by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, the last of whom went so far as to argue at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 for the institution of daily prayers.

Today, Scalia noted, the government exempts houses of worship from real-estate tax, pays for chaplains in Congress, state legislatures, and the military, and sanctions the opening of every Supreme Court session with the cry, "God save the United States!"

"To say that the Constitution allows the court to sweep away that long-standing attitude toward religion seems to me just wrong," he said. "I do think we're forgetting our roots."

Scalia's speech, at a conference marking the 350th anniversary both of Jews in America and of Shearith Israel, elicited a standing ovation.

Heilman continues:
Originally from New York, Scalia wore a black skull cap as he addressed the congregation with his back to the ark.

"The founding fathers never used the phrase 'separation of church and state,'" he said, arguing that rigid separation of religion and state – as in Europe, for example – would be bad for America and bad for the Jews.

"Do you think it's going to make Jews safer? It didn't prove that way in Europe," he said.

"You will not hear the word 'God' cross the lips of a French premier or an Italian head of state," Scalia said. "But that has never been the American way."

Scalia said expunging religion from public life would be bad for America, and that the courts, instead, should come around to most Americans' way of thinking and to the founding fathers' vision for the US. He noted that after a San Francisco court last year barred the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools because it includes the phrase "under God," Congress voted nearly unanimously to condemn the decision and uphold use of the phrase.

"I suggest that our jurisprudence should comport with our actions," he said.

If America's approach toward religion does change, it should be through democratic process, not "judicial fiat." America believes in "a personal God who takes an interest in the affairs of man," Scalia said. Quoting a line from Psalms that says the faithful will surely prosper, he added, "I think it is no accident that America has prospered."

hmmmm. no wonder the orthodox Liberal Jews were upset. Imagine owing prosperity to God! If you did you probably would not work on Shabbos and Yom Tov.

Should read: "Who didn't win" instead of who lost...

...but a great GOTV read anyway. from the NY Times

The Jewish Press found the Orthodox Kerry voter!!!!

Lonely, Liberal, And Orthodox
Posted 11/17/2004
By MENASHE Y. SHAPIRO


Another national election has passed, and I am more baffled than I have ever been. Not because of the result — deep down I knew the Democrats were going to blow it — and not because such a flawed president executed a brilliantly focused campaign. But once again I am bemused (or amused, depending on the hour of the day) by the voting habits of the Orthodox Jewish community.

Admittedly, as a proud Democrat I am part of an ever shrinking minority in the Orthodox community. We Orthodox liberals cast votes for the Kerry-Edwards ticket and supported Al Gore even before he picked Joe Lieberman as his running mate. We don`t like Rush, refuse to be "Hannitized," and don`t necessarily subscribe to the Fox News view of the world.

Unfortunately, our visibility diminishes daily, as the fog of "best" for Israel, "best" for the frum Jew, and a misplaced and misunderstood notion of hakarat hatov clouds our message. Today, Orthodox Jews take a narrow view of the world, often eschewing the big picture in favor of short-sighted and near-term benefit, usually by accepting the instructions of a Jewish "leader" possessing "access."

How is it that after growing up in a yeshiva environment where we were asked to critically analyze every issue, where we parsed distinctions in law and language, we allow ourselves to be dragged down to the lowest and most degrading levels when it comes to government and politics?

How is it that the people of the mind, the people of learning, the people of intellect, refused to listen to a nuanced position and readily joined the "flip-flop" chorus?
How did we come to embrace rejectionist labels and sound-bite government? When did a people who celebrate wisdom mistake stubbornness and simplicity for strength and conviction? When did destabilizing a country and turning a region into a den of terrorists become the supportive act of a "friend?" Moreover, how is telling Ariel Sharon one thing while telling the UN and the European Union the exact opposite an act of support?

How could the people of tzedakah look askance at anti-poverty programs as mere big government waste? Why do we respond to thousands of years of oppression by supporting foreign polices that mimic those of our medieval oppressors? How is it that after ascending to the upper echelons of modern society directly as a result of enlightened and progressive thinking, we turn our backs on all those who seek the to do the same?

How is it that after experiencing a religious and spiritual renaissance because we were left alone and respected by our neighbors, we race to join the ranks of evangelical xenophobia? How do we claim to value life, yet flock to a president who won`t allow science to preserve it?

Why do we think that we justify our unique educational needs by trying to force the rest of society to pay for it — and why are we dumb enough to think that a $2,000 voucher will actually pay for said education? Why do we think we can justify our own religious reproductive freedom by supporting restrictions on the reproductive freedom of others? Why do we think that American capital punishment statutorily or procedurally resembles halachic capital punishment?

When did we forget what made us great in America? When did we forget that the creation of Israel was a response to right-wing fascism? When did we forget who we really are?

I am just 30 years old. I came of age in Ronald Reagan`s America. I watched Reagan bungle Lebanon and Syria and bomb tents in Lybia. I observed Reagan visiting the tombs of Nazi SS soldiers. I saw Reagan criticize Israel for bombing Arafat`s home in Tunisia and then his secretary of state became the first American dignitary to confer legitimacy on Arafat. Yet AIPAC responded by concluding he was a great friend.

I grew up in a Republican-dominated America. When unbalanced budgets were known as "economic growth," homelessness was the fault of the developmentally disabled or the Vietnam veteran, and defense buildup meant $3,000 toilet seats. Logic obviously is not part of the equation.

So how do I answer my questions? Why and when did this happen? Bottom line, I don`t have the first clue.

Orthodox Jews wonder why Democrats have the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons of the world speak at their conventions. I wonder why a history of exalting James Baker, Pat Buchanan, Bob Dole and John Sununu, using moderate politicians as mere props for ultra-right policies, and virtually creating Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden escapes our scrutiny.

Orthodox Jews say Palestinians never had it as good as they do now, living under Israeli rule. Remember what it was like for them under Arab rule, they say. Israel has improved their lives. In 1860, Jefferson Davis was certain he had improved the lives of the African charges on his plantations.

Orthodox Jews ask why we must support the civil rights of those engaged in immorality (halachic and otherwise); after all, these civil rights can perpetuate an abomination. I say, go ahead. Pass the law or the amendment. Congratulations on eliminating immorality. But tomorrow may bring enforcement of any and all age restrictions for marriage, with society defining marriage as not just between a man and a woman, but between adults — not 18 year-old post adolescent seminary graduates. Take that one into our communities.

We are so worried about the slippery slope of open-mindedness that we forget the slippery slope of being close-minded and rigid. In our short-sighted drive to use our platform to protect our own interests, we forget exactly how we arrived at that platform. Or even what gave us the right to think we have interests in the first place.

Jewish life is predicated on meshing seeming contradictions. We are a people who reward hard work and protect personal property, but we expect and demand economic justice. We set rules for self-governance, but caution about respecting the outsider. We favor an organized society, but recognize the needs of the individual. Sound familiar? Is it Torah or the U.S. constitution?
As Jews, we must remember who we are, where we came from, and what brought us to this point. These are the lessons of our Torah, oral and written. Someday, we will remember this. Someday, the Orthodox community may actually look in the mirror before deciding who to vote for. ◙
Menashe Y. Shapiro is an attorney and Democratic activist living in Manhattan.

First he delivers Boro Park....

.... then he fights the UN. Is there anything that he cannot do when he puts his mind to it?

See the NY Sun reporting on the Brooklyn pols anti-UN stance.

Columbia counterattack

As usual the persecutors are fashioning themselves the victims. NY Daily News reports on more goings on in Morningside Heights

Monday, November 22, 2004

Moral values

Who says that moral values only apply to social issues? Is it not also a willingness to define good from evil as proclaimed in this NY Sun editorial?

More on Jewish Political Attitudes

Jews and the American Public Square

Free speech @ Columbia?

NY Daily News highlights some of the worst academic offenders

Was there ever one?

From WaPo

The End Of the 'Jewish Vote'

By Peter Beinart

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

No matter who wins on Tuesday, commentators will likely sift through the
exit polling and declare that, in at least one respect, President Bush
failed. Early this year some Republicans boasted that Bush would realign
Jewish American politics -- ending the community's 80-year love affair with
the Democratic Party. In recent weeks, however, with polls showing most Jews
planning to vote for John Kerry, the brash predictions have stopped. Jewish
Democrats are poised to declare victory, to announce that Bush's overtures
have come to naught.

But that won't be true. Because while President Bush hasn't realigned the
Jewish vote, he has done something even more intriguing: He has ended it.

The term "Jewish vote" implies a shared political perspective that binds
Jews more to one another than to gentiles. In this sense, there has not been
an "Episcopalian vote" or a "Catholic vote" for a long time. In the 1950s
Christian denominations meant something at the polling booth. Catholics and
Southern Baptists generally voted Democratic. Episcopalians and other
main-line Protestants, especially in the North, voted Republican. But
starting in the 1970s, religious denomination began to matter less -- and
religious intensity to matter more and more. Catholics who went to Mass
every week started voting more like Episcopalians who went to church every
week than like Catholics who didn't. During the culture wars of the 1990s,
the trend accelerated. This spring a study by the University of Akron's John
Green for the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found "that religious
traditionalists, whether Evangelical, Mainline Protestant or Catholic, hold
similar positions on issue after issue, and that modernists of all these
various traditions are similarly like-minded." With the critical exception
of African Americans -- whose religiousness has not generally inclined them
toward the GOP -- traditionalist Christians voted Republican while modernist
Christians voted Democratic.

Jews, however, were different. As late as 2000, Al Gore and his Orthodox
running mate, Joe Lieberman, didn't just win most of the Jewish vote, they
won a large majority among Orthodox Jews -- the "traditionalists" whom
sociologists might have expected to join their Christian counterparts. But
it now appears that, like Jimmy Carter, who won the votes of his fellow
evangelicals in 1976, Lieberman simply delayed his community's migration
into the Republican Party. This year, for probably the first time, Orthodox
Jews will vote like "traditionalist" Christians. Conservative, Reform and
non-affiliated Jews, on the other hand, will vote like secular, or
"modernist," Christians. And the Jewish vote, in a meaningful sense, will
cease to exist.

George W. Bush deserves much of the credit. Some commentators speculated
that his strong support for Ariel Sharon would win over Jewish voters.
Actually, it has divided them. Orthodox Jews are far more likely to vote on
Israel than other Jews. According to a recent American Jewish Committee
survey, 74 percent of Orthodox Jews feel "very close" to Israel, compared
with only 31 percent of Jews overall. And Orthodox Jews are also more likely
to oppose dismantling settlements, which puts them more in sync with Bush
and Sharon's hard-line policies.

If Bush's Israel policy has attracted Orthodox Jews, his domestic agenda has
alienated their non-Orthodox counterparts. In particular, Conservative,
Reform and unaffiliated Jews express a clear antipathy toward the agenda of
the Christian Right. According to the American Jewish Committee, roughly
three-quarters of them oppose government aid to religious schools. But among
Orthodox Jews, who are far more likely to send their children to such
schools, and who often feel considerable financial strain as a result, the
sentiment is almost exactly the reverse. Two-thirds of the Orthodox support
government funding of religious education. When Republican Sens. Norm
Coleman and Rick Santorum traveled to Borough Park in Brooklyn during the
Republican National Convention to meet with a select group of Orthodox
rabbis, school vouchers was among the top issues on the agenda. Gay marriage
also pits Orthodox Jews against their more secular counterparts. As Binyamin
Jolkovsky, editor and publisher of JewishWorldReview.com, recently told the
Jewish Week newspaper, "There are two distinct Jewish communities right now, the general Jewish community and the Orthodox. Our value systems are so different."

Don't expect this to have a dramatic impact at the polls. Orthodox Jews make
up less than 10 percent of the American Jewish population, so even though
they will probably vote overwhelmingly for President Bush, he will still
overwhelmingly lose the Jewish vote as a whole. But beyond Nov. 2, the
Orthodox migration into the Republican Party is part of a larger
transformation: Religion is eclipsing ethnicity as a force in American
politics. To be an Irish Catholic or a German Lutheran used to have real
political meaning. Today those patchwork divisions, which stretch back more
than a century, are fading. Increasingly, America, or at least white
America, has just two political cultures: religious and secular. And next
week Jews -- who have held out longer than their Christian brethren -- will
finally choose sides.

Won't they ever learn?

From the JTA

With G.A. remarks about Bush,
leader shows election rift unhealed
By Rachel Pomerance
NEW YORK, Nov. 21 (JTA) — Washington spinmasters William Kristol and James Carville traded their typical quick-witted takes on the presidential election in a plenary session at the annual gathering of the North American Jewish federation system.
But the real zinger came from the master of ceremonies.

Shoshana Cardin dismayed some members of the audience — and delighted others — with her prepared remarks on the challenges the Jewish community faces under the Bush administration.

“There is a contradiction between our agenda and the Republican sweep,” said Cardin, a past president of the federation system and of JTA. “The struggle to adapt to an agenda that is as Christian” as the Republican agenda, she said, “is our struggle.”

She also said President Bush’s comments in his first news conference after re-election, when he pledged to “reach out to all who share my goals,” were troubling.

“That doesn’t exactly include me,” Cardin said in her remarks Nov. 15. “To reach out means to all, not only to those who share his goals.”

Cardin’s speech was one of two clear ripples the presidential election sent through the United Jewish Communities’ General Assembly, held Nov. 14-17 in Cleveland.

The second controversy, over whether to send Bush a letter congratulating him on his election victory, was further proof that the Jewish community hasn’t completely come together in support of the administration a few weeks after a bitterly divisive election.

Cardin is a registered Democrat, but she told JTA that she voted for Bush because she believes he understands the importance of the war on terrorism and has the strength to wage it.

Though some in the audience took offense at Cardin’s comments, she said they weren’t meant to bash the president but to stress the need for the Jewish community to emphasize its own values, which sometimes may clash with Christian ones.

“We have to recognize that we are in a wonderful host country, but the calendar is Christian and the values that are being espoused now by ‘Middle America,’ if you will, are Christian values, and we have to speak up and express our values, which are not identical,” she told JTA. She noted, for example, the difference in religious Christian and Jewish views about when life begins.

Not everyone took Cardin’s remarks at the G.A. as she intended them.

At least one federation director, who asked to remain anonymous, walked out of the session because he found the talk inappropriately partisan. While Cardin’s words did win some applause, several in the audience said Cardin had exploited her role, using the stage as a bully pulpit.

“I don’t believe the G.A. is the forum for it,” Robert Goldberg, chairman of the UJC’s board of trustees, said of Cardin’s comments.

Cardin, who was recognized as “an exceptional volunteer leader” at the General Assembly — the quarterly Journal of Jewish Communal Service was dedicated to her — is known for speaking her mind.

The most famous example of that came under the first President Bush, when Cardin told him during a White House meeting that his depiction of himself fending off pro-Israel activists in a dispute over U.S. loan guarantees fueled anti-Semitism.

The president not only apologized to Jewish officials for his comment, but reportedly also shed a tear over it.

The second political controversy came at a joint meeting of the UJC governing bodies, the Board of Trustees and Delegate Assembly, during debate on a motion to congratulate President Bush on his re-election.

The motion passed the Delegate Assembly nearly unanimously, but not before a round of public comments showed that some took issue with the idea.

The debate shows “that there are lingering tensions within the Jewish community, which I think reflect the fact that there are lingering tensions within the American community,” said Eric Stillman, executive director of the Jewish Federation of Greater New Orleans.

Stillman reminded those present that President Bush had congratulated former UJC President and CEO Stephen Hoffman when he took over the organization in 2001.

The idea of sending a letter was meant as “a positive gesture that UJC and the federations wanted to demonstrate to whoever won the presidency that we were looking forward to working with that person,” Stillman told JTA.

Daniel Chejfec, executive director of the Central Kentucky Jewish Federation, said he voted against the motion because the federation system should be non-partisan.

“Our main trust is not to support one party or the other” but “to keep the community together and to build consensus,” Chejfec said. Sending Bush a letter of congratulations would polarize the community, he said.

Others said a congratulatory letter was not a political statement.

President Bush “should know that he has the support of the Jewish community through the federation system,” Goldberg told JTA. “It’s a message to the president: ‘Now that you’re elected, we’re going to all support you.’ ”

John Ruskay, executive vice president and CEO of the UJA-Federation of New York, received widespread applause when he noted that the country already had chosen its leader, and the Jewish community would need his aid on numerous matters.

Richard Wexler of Chicago, UJC’s vice chairman, said he doubted whether the letter to President Bush is likely to “make a whole lot of difference in how his administration deals with issues that relate to the things we value.”

Still, he noted, “every Shabbat we say a prayer for the leader of our country, and maybe this resolution was in keeping with that.”

But Wexler noted the importance of impartiality in the federation system, and had strong words for Cardin.

“The leadership of our communities need to be impartial in public gatherings, and when she was given this program to moderate I’m sure it was given with the expectation that she would keep the trust that was imposed on her by her selection,” he said. “Instead, she chose to use it as her personal political forum.”

Cardin, however, said she “was told to give my perception of the result of the election for the Jewish community.”

She was not told to be controversial, though “giving my perspective would automatically be controversial,” she admitted.

“It’s not at all my personal agenda,” she said. “I believe this is what we’re experiencing.”

She knew that Carville and Kristol would provide both sides of the partisan debate, she said, and “I would explain what I thought are our challenges.”

Cardin added that she thought the debate over congratulating Bush was superfluous.

“It’s appropriate that we acknowledge the victory in the election,” she said, “and the fact that he is our president for the next four years.”


Sunday, November 21, 2004

'The Jewish vote ain't what it used to be'

Here's the Jerusalem Post's take

Jewish vote in 2000


Take a look at this recap of the Jewish vote in election 2000

Kosher Nostra

Kosher Nostra

No matter what the pollsters call the percentages, and I doubt that we will really know for certain, 2004 will represent a historical shift in the voting patterns of the Jewish community. The most traditional elements of the Jewish community have planted themselves firmly opposite the long time Jewish voting pattern of a firm alignment with the Democratic left.

Is this the beginning of a trend or the culmination of a shift that has been solidified through the leadership of President George W. Bush?